<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>"One Little Hour" &#187; Carl McIntire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paulmatzko.edublogs.org/tag/carl-mcintire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paulmatzko.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>For what is your life? It is even a vapour...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:59:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Historical Perspective: Come Out or Stay Put?</title>
		<link>http://paulmatzko.edublogs.org/2009/06/03/historical-perspective-come-out-or-stay-put/</link>
		<comments>http://paulmatzko.edublogs.org/2009/06/03/historical-perspective-come-out-or-stay-put/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paulmatzko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl McIntire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evangelicalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundagelical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harold Ockenga]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmatzko.edublogs.org/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the 1940s and 50s, during the late stages of the Fundamentalist-Modernist controversy, Fundamentalists divided into two roughly defined camps: those who left the mainline denominations to avoid the leaven of modernism and those who remained behind in hopes of reforming the established denominations from within. Representative of those Fundamentalists who withdrew (or were forced) from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the 1940s and 50s, during the late stages of the Fundamentalist-Modernist controversy, Fundamentalists divided into two roughly defined camps:<span id="more-81"></span> those who left the mainline denominations to avoid the leaven of modernism and those who remained behind in hopes of reforming the established denominations from within. Representative of those Fundamentalists who withdrew (or were forced) from the mainline denominations was Carl McIntire and other separatist members of the American Council of Christian Churches. On the other hand, Harold Ockenga and members of the National Association of Evangelicals often remained part of the denominations.</p>
<p>During the time of religious revival post-WWII, these two branches of fundamentalism split into what we call modern fundamentalism and new evangelicalism. The new evangelicals saw their position as keeping the baby while draining the bathwater. The fundamentalists thought the old denominations irreversibly corrupted.</p>
<p>Thus it is ironic that these two camps have mutated and now seem to have switched positions. I attend a <a href="http://www.gracebiblechurchne.org/" target="_blank">church</a> in Philadelphia that has been described by the pastor as &#8220;fundagelical.&#8221; In other words, it attempts to split the difference between fundamentalism and evangelicalism, though in all honesty the accent belongs on the second half of the word. Indeed, among self-declared fundamentalists there is a growing movement called <a title="Young Fundamentalism's flagship website" href="http://www.sharperiron.org/" target="_blank">&#8220;Young Fundamentalism&#8221;</a> that seeks to <a title="Kevin Bauder's defense of Reformed fundamentalism" href="http://www.centralseminary.edu/publications/Nick/Nick217.html" target="_blank">counter</a> the more radical fringes of fundamentalism. The (as of yet) implicit point of distinction between young, conservative evangelicals and young fundamentalists is similar to that which historically separated fundamentalism from new evangelicalism, but with one key difference: they have switched sides.</p>
<p>Conservative evangelical emigrés leave fundamentalism because they think it unsalvageably marked by legalism and isolationism; they must leave for happier (and often, more Reformed) climes. Young fundamentalists, on the other hand, argue that fundamentalism is worth saving. To leave the movement now would be to eject the good along with the bad; better to stay fundamentalists and purge it from within.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paulmatzko.edublogs.org/2009/06/03/historical-perspective-come-out-or-stay-put/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the Day</title>
		<link>http://paulmatzko.edublogs.org/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://paulmatzko.edublogs.org/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>paulmatzko</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Church History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fundamentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl McIntire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franklin Roosevelt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paulmatzko.edublogs.org/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Currently I am researching for a seminar paper on the politicization of Carl McIntire and what his story can tell us about the re-entrance of evangelicals into political discourse during the 1950s and 60s. Very little academic work has been done on Carl McIntire (though now that Princeton is processing his papers I expect more to follow) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Currently I am researching for a seminar paper on the politicization of Carl McIntire and what his story can tell us about the re-entrance of evangelicals into political discourse during the 1950s and 60s. Very little academic work has been done on Carl McIntire (though now that Princeton is processing his papers I expect more to follow) except for one 2007 article by Heather Hendershot in the <em>American Quarterly</em>.</p>
<p>Dr. Hendershot began the article with a piece of correspondence to Carl McIntire from an anonymous listener of his radio show, The Twentieth Century Reformation Hour.</p>
<blockquote><p>500 years ago Moses said, &#8220;Pack your camel, pick up your shovel, mount your ass, and I shall lead you to the Promised land.&#8221; 500 years later, F.D. Roosevelt said, &#8220;Lay down your shovel, sit on your ass, light up a Camel, this is the promised land.&#8221; Today, Nixon will tax your shovel, sell your camel, kick your ass, and tell you there is no promised land.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>P.S. I am glad that I am an American, I am glad that I am free, but I wish I were a little doggy and Nixon were a tree.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://paulmatzko.edublogs.org/2009/02/28/quote-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
